In a move that has left many baffled, Scarfmore, despite his own shady past actions, is now on a mission to convince the populace that remunerating the civil service in United States dollars is an untenable proposition. This claim seems preposterous, particularly in light of his entanglement in a currency-related scandal that drained foreign funds. Now, as he enlists economists of questionable repute to bolster his position, the ulterior motive behind his administration’s resistance to compensating civil servants in the robust US dollar currency starts to emerge.
It’s rather ironic that Scarfmore’s party, populated by ageing elites, appears to have developed amnesia regarding the era when the civil service was recompensed in US dollars. This wasn’t a whimsical notion in yesteryears. The legitimate and resilient party that has weathered adversity since its genesis managed to achieve what seemed an unattainable feat for the Zanu PF. This casts aspersions on Scarfmore’s legitimacy, especially since he usurped power from the rightful leader, Chamisa. Scarfmore’s lacklustre approach towards addressing critical issues like unemployment and healthcare only exacerbates public outcry for fair remuneration in a stable currency.
At the core of Scarfmore’s objection to dollar remuneration lies his longing to retain a stranglehold over the monetary apparatus. Relinquishing this control would signify an end to the dubious practice of quantitative easing—a ruse that artificially bloats the money supply. This tactic, synonymous with money printing, has been manipulated by economists like Mangudya and Mthuli to hoodwink the populace. Scarfmore’s scoffing at the scenario underlines his eagerness for aid money destined for disaster-ravaged regions, unmasking his self-centred ambitions.
A relinquishment of the printing press would compel Scarfmore’s regime to adopt financial prudence. The rampant unchecked profligacy and corruption in government quarters would be stemmed, as deficits could no longer be masked by reckless monetary expansion. Scarfmore’s acolytes, who thrive on these practices, would find their looting spree curtailed. Scarfmore’s dominion relies on keeping his loyal base in line to sustain his fragile grip on power amidst internal party discord.
By steadfastly rebuffing the civil service’s plea for payment in US dollars, Scarfmore shields his vested interests. His staunch backers act as a bulwark against factional rivalry, thwarting adversaries from toppling his reign. Figures like Ezra Chadzamira, Rushwaya, and Obadiah Moyo epitomise this dynamic, elucidating Scarfmore’s view of the US dollar as a dire threat to his reign and elucidating his reluctance to heed the civil service’s appeals.
However, Scarfmore’s party, Zanu PF, needs to acknowledge that their rejection of the US dollar for civil service compensation unveils their failure. Scarfmore’s personal motives and power consolidation have overshadowed national welfare. As the citizenry clamours for economic steadiness and fair compensation, Scarfmore’s stubborn stance emerges as a stark indicator of his administration’s failings.
In summary, Scarfmore’s aversion to paying civil servants in US dollars, notwithstanding his own dubious financial past, lays bare his self-serving agenda. This choice not only belittles the populace’s needs but also exposes Scarfmore’s real intentions. As cries for equitable remuneration and stability reverberate, Scarfmore’s obstinacy only exacerbates the atmosphere of national disillusionment.
About The Author
